Michel wrote:
That's silly. The "scientific" publisher should use Istock, the results would be in a genuine environment, and probably better and cheaper. Actually, even professional cede their copyrights on pictures used for education purpose.
They only used me for weird stuff they couldn't get on stock pages ...
my ex boss's mother was involved - she'd call in a panick - i need a shot of a ...
but this was a publisher making money for education ...