Study: Daytime TV Makes You Dumb

Started by TehBorken, Mar 21 06 06:50

Previous topic - Next topic

TehBorken

 [h1 style="font-family: Verdana; font-weight: normal;"]I always knew Oprah was bad your brain![/h1][hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px;"]Daytime TV tied to poorer mental scores in elderly
                 [div class="storyhdr"]       [span] By Amy Norton [/span] [em class="timedate"]Mon Mar 20, 10:41 AM ET[/em]
 [/p]           [/div] NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Older women who say talk shows and soap operas are their favorite TV programs tend to score more poorly on tests of memory, attention and other cognitive skills, researchers reported Monday. [/p]That doesn't mean that daytime television is a brain drain, they say, since it's not clear that there's a direct relationship between the two.[/p] But the findings do point to some association between TV choices and intellectual function, and that could prove useful in evaluating older people for cognitive decline, according lead investigator Dr. Joshua Fogel of Brooklyn College of the City University of New York.[/p] A study of 289 older women without dementia found that those who rated talk shows and soaps as their favorite programs performed more poorly on tests of memory, attention and mental quickness than their peers who cited other types of shows.[/p] What's more, they were at greater risk of showing signs of clinical impairment. For example, compared with women who preferred to watch news programs, those who favored soaps were more than seven times more likely to show signs of impairment on one of the tests, while talk show fans were more than 13 times more likely to demonstrate impairment.[/p] "Those findings are quite robust," Fogel told Reuters Health.[/p] He said it's not possible to tell whether the programs somehow contribute to cognitive decline or whether women in the early stages of decline gravitate toward those shows. Preferences for daytime TV could also be a marker of a sedentary, homebound lifestyle, and research suggests that staying physically and socially active can help stave off mental decline.[/p] But regardless of the reasons, a preference for talk shows and soaps "is a marker of something suspicious," Fogel said.[/p] He believes that doctors could ask older patients about their favorite TV shows as one way of spotting those who might need more screening for cognitive decline.[/p] "It's really a simple, friendly question to ask," Fogel said.[/p] The findings, which are published in the Southern Medical Journal, are based on questionnaires and standard cognitive tests completed by 289 women ages 70 to 79. None had dementia or physical disabilities and the researchers factored in variables such as education, race, depression and history of heart attack, high blood pressure or diabetes.[/p] Even with those factors considered, TV habits were related to cognitive performance.[/p] According to Fogel, a potential explanation rests in the fact that talk shows and soap operas involve so-called "parasocial relationships," where viewers feel a connection to a show's characters or host. Such shows may, for instance, be better able to hold the attention of older women with some cognitive impairment.[/p] "This doesn't mean 'Oprah' is bad for you," Fogel said. However, an older woman's fondness for the show could signal a possible problem, according to the researcher.[/p] Asking patients about TV viewing and other daily activities could be "very useful" in assessing their cognitive health, according to Dr. Joe Verghese of Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York.[/p] But it's not time to toss the remote control, he writes in an accompanying editorial. Some programs, Verghese notes, might actually benefit intellectual functioning, and TV watching can help some people manage their stress levels.[/p] SOURCE: Southern Medical Journal, March 2006.
vny!://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060320/hl_nm/daytime_tv_dc_1
 [/p]
The real trouble with reality is that there's no background music.

Future Canadian

TehBorken wrote:
 That doesn't mean that daytime television is a brain drain, they say, since it's not clear that there's a direct relationship between the two.

 Sheesh, what more do they need, a map?

No intellectual stimulation=no brain cells a firin'
...religion has made some contributions to civilization. It helped in the early days to fix the calendar, and it caused Egyptian priests to chronicle ecplipses with such care that in time they were able to predict them. These two services I am prepared to acknowledge, but I do not know of any others

Marik

I watch Jerry Springer/Maury every now and then just to see the peoples' reaction.  Yesterday, they caught some disabled guy (with no lower body = no penis) in bed with this guy's girlfriend! ... even I was shocked.

P.C.

Of course there's always the possibility that people already possessing the lack of these skills are satisfied with these shows BECAUSE they lack certain skills.  The study would have had to include testing on these same women BEFORE they started watching them, and then again after a set period of time.

  Like most studies, they always fall short of gathering ALL the criteria before they can make a sensible conclusion.  What else do these women do with their time.....do they read ?  and if so, what are they reading.  Harlequin Romances or The Iliad ????  Are they invovled with their community....do they work in the garden or do crossword puzzles ????  Pretty flimsy study IMHO.

  Test results can be led in any direction with absolute accuracy simply by structuring the questions accordingly or omitting questions that could paint a bigger picture.  
Sir Isaac Newton invented the swinging door....for the convenience of his cat.

CK

99% of tv will rot a persons brain, day or night.  1% may actually teach a person something.

P.C.

I agree with that CK.  Not to mention the time it takes away from everything else.  I don't watch too much TV....and yet it's on many days it's almost from dawn to dusk.  Hubby watches to news in the morning, and it's still on the news channel when he gets home....lol.
Sir Isaac Newton invented the swinging door....for the convenience of his cat.

CK

I am guilty too, I watch too much TV. But over time I learned to turn it off too. Enjoy other activities.

P.C.

The thing is, I DON'T watch it.....the blasted thing is just ON.  I'll even pop in a CD to listen to, and  I STILL don't turn it off.  It's a stupid little habit to simply not just switch it off.....LOL.  I think it's some warped form of company or motion in the house when I'm here all day.

  My 2 guilty pleasures are  The Apprentice and Boston Legal.  Other than that it's news or any program about animals and nature.  (when hubby's not watching sports) heeheeee.
Sir Isaac Newton invented the swinging door....for the convenience of his cat.

CK

I was mentioning yesterday, I am finding Bob the Builder is pretty intriguing. So patient and smart. Helps anyone too without question!

Adam_Fulford

It doesn't surprise me.  A different epidemiological study showed lower average cognitive function associated with Bush supporters.  

TehBorken

 I hardly ever watch TV....not enough time, not enough interest. I have a big ol' LCD TV but about the only thing I ever watch are movies on DVD. It's still a "[a href="vny!://janda.org/b20/News%20articles/vastwastland.htm"]vast wasteland[/a]", as Newton Minnow, Chairman of the FCC, observed back in 1961.
 
The real trouble with reality is that there's no background music.

Sportsdude

Soap Opera's bore me anyway.

I just watch CNN during the day.  
"We can't stop here. This is bat country."

tenkani

What I find most depressing is how previously respectable channels like the Learning Channel and A&E have moved steadily towards a diet of reality shows and whatnot. It's all about the benjis, and Americans are just not that interested in learning. They'de rather be spoon fed pabulum    

  Even the popular "science" shows really have very little to do with science. Sorry, but watching someone blow up a TV or see how long they can dogpaddle unprotected in freezing water isn't "science" unless they bother to effectively explain the principles at work, which generally speaking they don't even attempt, or if they do attempt it, they do a shitty job. Again, it's because Americans are mentally lazy and prefer to veg out rather than be challenged by television.

  I know this sounds pretty judgemental, but I think I have a right to be upset because the choices of others are limiting my own choices. Even the niche TV channels have decided to target the lowest common denominator, and the rest of us are just shit out of luck. I've pretty much given up on TV completely, since finding something worth watching is such a damn chore.
For thou art with me; thy cream and thy sugar they comfort me
Thou preparest a carafe before me in the presence of Juan Valdez
Thou anointest my day with pep; my mug runneth over
Surely richness and taste shall follow me all the days of my life
And I will dwell in the house of coffee forever.

kitten

I think my one guilty pleasure would be Extreme Makeover: Home Edition.  Apart from that it's just the news and weather.  I'm getting much more enjoyment from my computer than I ever did with TV.
Thousands of years ago cats were worshipped.  They have not forgotten.

Sportsdude

I like the National Geographic channel. Especially if they do something about the Canadian wild.

oh, that reminds me my favourite adventure wild show is that show "Wild America." Its this guy narrorating about animals in the wild. Completely fascinating!  
"We can't stop here. This is bat country."