the property is collateral for the loan. Initially, the mortgage company figured that the value in the property was enough to cover the loan and expenses........that's why they send out their assessors before approving the loan. If the homeowner walks away, the mortgage is left holding the collateral which is now worth less then before.
Let me get my pea-like brain around this....lol
The mortgage company doesn't actually give a loan for the purchase of the property (as in cold hard cash.....all paperwork.....yes, no?
The mortgage company doesn't actually own the property that the purchaser is mortgaging....yes, no?
If the homeowner walks away, the mortgage company now owns the property...yes, no?
Why is the property necessarily worth less than before? Could it not just as easily be worth more than before?
Don't they receive money monthly that they can now get all over again for the same property?
Where is the loss to the mortgage company ?
I'm still confused.