[font style="font-weight: bold;" size="4"][span class="headline"]Fraud linked to TJX data heist spreads[/span][/font]
[font size="1"][span class="author"]Robert Lemos[/span], [span class="source"]SecurityFocus[/span] [span class="date"]2007-01-26[/span][/font]
[p class="firstParagraph"] Banks and retailers in the United States and Canada have begun to report an increasing amount of illicit transactions thought to be linked to the server breach announced last week by the TJX Companies, the commercial giant that owns retail chains in the U.S., Canada and Europe.[/p][p class="firstParagraph"][span class="body"] More than 60 of the 205 banks in Massachusetts have begun reissuing cards after being contacted by credit-card companies about compromised cards, the Massachusetts Bankers Association stated this week. However, only half of the state's banks have reported in to the group. The transactions have occurred in at least three states--as well as Hong Kong and Sweden, the MBA said in statement.[/p] The group warned consumers that credit-card and bank fraud does not necessarily mean that the data thieves have stolen someone's identity.[/p] "The two can be related but thankfully most often they are separate and distinct," Daniel Forte, CEO and president of the MBA, said in the statement. "Be vigilant and don't give thieves any more informaiton to make ID theft more of a risk."[/p] Last week, the TJX Companies [a href="vny!://www.securityfocus.com/brief/411"]announced that the firm[/a] had suffered an unauthorized intrusion into its "computer systems that process and store information related to customer transactions." TJX declined to mention the scope of its breach, but said that the unauthorized intruder accessed TJX's computer systems for its T.J. Maxx, Marshalls, HomeGoods and A.J. Wright stores in the U.S. and Puerto Rico, and its Winners and HomeSense stores in Canada.[/p] In Vermont, one bank had to reissue cards to 1,600 customers because of the compromise, [a href="vny!://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/business/16537682.htm" target="_blank"]according to the Associated Press[/a]. In Canada, thousands of customer who shopped at Winners and HomeSense stores have become the victims of fraud, according to [a href="vny!://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20070125.wwinners25/BNStory/National/" target="_blank"]news reports[/a].[/p] With many states passing breach notification laws, such privacy-affecting pronouncements have become a regular part of corporate news in [a href="vny!://www.securityfocus.com/news/11366"]2005[/a] and [a href="vny!://www.securityfocus.com/news/11432"]2006[/a], but in many cases no link is made between the breach and subsequent data fraud. In December, the University of California, Los Angeles [a href="vny!://www.securityfocus.com/news/11429"]warned[/a] that a server containing information on about 800,000 students, faculty members and workers had been exposed by a compromise. Also last year, the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs [a href="vny!://www.securityfocus.com/brief/224"]warned[/a] that a laptop containing names, addresses and social-security numbers of nearly every soldier and sailor in the armed forces had been stolen. The laptop [a href="vny!://www.securityfocus.com/brief/241"]was later recovered[/a].[/p] Historically, such breaches have not led to provable fraud, according to analyst firm Javelin Strategy & Research, which surveys the victims of identity fraud annually. In an analysis released in August, the firm found that only 6 percent of all identity fraud--defined as someone using the victim's accounts or creating new accounts in the victim's name--where the source could be identified resulted from a breach. Looked at another way, only 0.8 percent of those alerted of a breach actually became the victims of fraud, said Bruce Cundiff, senior analyst with Javelin Strategy & Research.[/p] Even so, the cost of cleaning up a breach is enormous and, to a large extent, shouldered by the banks.[/p] "It makes sense that the banks are crying foul because the banks have to foot the bill," Cundiff said. "There is an uproar among banks, saying that--through no fault of our own--we have to pay to fix this."[/p] However, the latest epidemic of fraud could change that, if legislation is passed forcing credit-card companies to reveal the source of the fraud. The incident comes just weeks after the Democratic Party formed the majority party in Congress and could lend impetus to their efforts to rewrite consumer credit protection laws and breach notification statutes.[/p] "I learned of the latest data breach from a financial institution that may have to bear the costs of informing customers and issuing new credit cards but they were not told why," Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.), chairman of the House Committee on Financial Services, said in a statement following the announcement of the TJX breach last week. "This is further evidence of the need for a provision that Democrats pushed for in last year's debate over data security. Mainly, those institutions where breaches have occurred must be identified and they must bear responsibility."[/p] It's a change that banks are looking forward to as well, Forte said in the MBA's statement.[/p] "It is critical that the card associations--Visa, Mastercard, etc.--and public officials carefully evaluate whether the source of the breach should be identified quickly and be held liable for a data breach, particularly if the information being stored is in violation of card-network rules," Forte stated, noting that banks typically shoulder the burden of paying for replacement cards.[/p] The TJX Companies stock price fell $0.40, or about 1.3 percent, by midday on Friday.[/p][/span] [/p]
