Cloned Meat

Started by Lise, Dec 28 06 10:24

Previous topic - Next topic

Would you eat cloned meat?

Yes
1 (16.7%)
Maybe
4 (66.7%)
No
1 (16.7%)

Total Members Voted: 6

Lise

So the FDA has just recently approved the use of consumption of cloned meat. Would you eat cloned meat? I'm not sure myself. I might on a dare but don't really want to. Who knows what really goes into these guys. Then again, I'm not even sure if all our produce are not genetically modified in some way or another.

  Is it me or I think the FDA is wrong in saying that you don't need to attach 'special labels' to let the consumer know the product is a cloned or not? Heck, give me the choice to decide!

  If only organic produce were a bit more cheaper..............................

  [SPAN class=timestamp][FONT color=#ef4d15]
[/FONT][/SPAN][SPAN class=storyheading3][FONT size=5][FONT color=#bf5f00]Cloned meat safe to eat, FDA to say[/FONT]
[/FONT]
[/SPAN][SPAN class=storydeck3]Opponents cite medical, ethical issues[/SPAN]


[FONT size=1][SPAN class=author]By LIBBY QUAID
[/SPAN]Associated Press[/FONT]

 WASHINGTON - Federal scientists have concluded there is no difference between food from cloned animals and food from conventional livestock, setting the stage for the government to declare today that cloned animals are safe for the human food supply.

 The Food and Drug Administration planned to brief industry groups in advance of an announcement. The agency indicated it would approve cloned livestock in a scientific journal article published online earlier this month.

 The agency "concludes that meat and milk from clones and their progeny is as safe to eat as corresponding products derived from animals produced using contemporary agricultural practices," FDA scientists Larisa Rudenko and John Matheson wrote in the Jan. 1 issue of Theriogenology.

 Also, [FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffbf"]FDA believes that no special labels are needed for food from clones or their offspring, the scientists wrote.[/FONT] Consumer groups say labels are a must, because surveys have shown people to be uncomfortable with the idea of cloned livestock.

 "Consumers are going to be having a product that has potential safety issues and has a whole load of ethical issues tied to it, without any labeling," said Joseph Mendelson, legal director of the Center for Food Safety.

 Carol Tucker Foreman, director of food policy at the Consumer Federation of America, said the FDA is ignoring research that shows cloning results in more deaths and deformed animals than other reproductive technologies.

 The consumer federation will ask food companies and supermarkets to refuse to sell food from clones, she said.

 "Meat and milk from cloned animals have no benefit for consumers, and consumers don't want them in their foods," Foreman said.

 The FDA scientists wrote that by the time clones reached 6 to 18 months of age, they were "virtually indistinguishable" from conventionally bred animals.

 Final approval of cloned animals for food is months away; the FDA will accept comments from the public after issuing a risk assessment today.

 Those in favor of the technology say it would be used primarily for breeding and not for steak or pork tenderloin.

 Cloning lets farmers and ranchers make copies of exceptional animals, such as pigs that fatten rapidly or cows that are superior milk producers.

 "We clone an animal because we want a genetic twin of that animal," said Barb Glenn of the Biotechnology Industry Organization.

 "It's not a genetically engineered animal; no genes have been changed or moved or deleted," she said.

 Thus, consumers would mostly get food from their offspring and not the clones themselves, Glenn said.

 

 [A href="vny!://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/business/4429485.html"][FONT size=1]vny!://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/business/4429485.html[/FONT][/A]

Always end the name of your child with a vowel, so that when you yell the name will carry.
Bill Cosby.

Russ

A clone is a copy of a selected animal/plant/goat. So I would eat it, as it has to be living for a while before they can harvest it, so any imperfections would have been noticed.

  I dont think I would have any issues whatsoever. That being said, Im one of those that laugh at organic foods.
Mercy to the Guilty is Torture to the Victims

tenkani

No special labelling necessary? f*ck you very much, FDA.
Whether it's safe or not, like the goddess said, consumers should have a right to make their own decisions based on all the facts. Please tell me if my food is full of added hormones, cloned, genetically modified or infused with angry nanobots.

The problem with choice, however, is that if cloned meat becomes much cheaper to produce than the more traditional variety, it may completely dominate the market, in which case choice becomes somewhat moot.

There's no easy answer though, since cloned meat and GM grains and whatnot could alleviate starvation around the globe. So where do we draw the line between caution and compassion?
 
For thou art with me; thy cream and thy sugar they comfort me
Thou preparest a carafe before me in the presence of Juan Valdez
Thou anointest my day with pep; my mug runneth over
Surely richness and taste shall follow me all the days of my life
And I will dwell in the house of coffee forever.

kitten

As long as it's meat, I'm not worried about how it was created.  A clone is a genetic copy, so I can't see any difference.  
Thousands of years ago cats were worshipped.  They have not forgotten.

Russ

kitten wrote:
 As long as it's meat, I'm not worried about how it was created.  A clone is a genetic copy, so I can't see any difference.

 
 Yes, I agree one hundred percent! And like I put, if there is any problems, it will be noticed when it is alive and put down.

      Tenkani: I do however agree that it should be marked as such. It will create jobs and controversy while making the non modified meat expensive and the cloned cheaper, which will make it cheaper for me in the long run.
Mercy to the Guilty is Torture to the Victims

rocketman

apparently, if there is money to be made, then it gets approved

Lise

rocketman wrote:
apparently, if there is money to be made, then it gets approved

     But I thought the FDA is above all that. Afterall, were they not created in the first place to watch over things like these?

  It's scary to think that the FDA don't seem to see anything wrong with not labelling cloned meat.
Always end the name of your child with a vowel, so that when you yell the name will carry.
Bill Cosby.