Good, this is exactly what should happen if you try to destroy the lives of other people by making false allegations.
[hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px;"][h1 class="article"][a href="vny!://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23367303-details/Prison+for+lapdance+teenager+who+cried+rape/article.do"]Prison for lapdance teenager who cried rape[/a][/h1][img]vny!://img.dailymail.co.uk//i/pix/2006/09/sanninoWNS180906_228x317.jpg" alt="" height="317" width="228"][font size="1"]
Caught red-handed: Cinzia Sannino's lapdance was filmed
on a mobile phone
[/font]A teenager who entertained four men in a Cardiff Bay flat with a private lap dance - which was filmed on a mobile phone - has been sent to jail for crying rape. Cinzia Sannino, 18, of Llanishen, Cardiff, was locked up for six months at Cardiff Crown Court after she admitted making false allegations.[/p]She had claimed to police that she had been raped after asking officers for a lift home.[/p]Prosecutor Chris Lewis last week told the court how the men were kept in police custody for 36 hours - but the video of the lap dance was produced to prove the men's innocence.[/p]Sannino withdrew the complaint and admitted to carrying out an act intended to pervert the course of justice.[/p]The court heard she had been drinking alcohol and could not remember much about what happened. She was sentenced to six months in a young offenders institution by Mr Justice Roderick Evans last Friday.[/p]A spokeswoman for the voluntary False Allegations Support Organisation (FASO) today welcomed the punishment. She said: "Up to now girls who falsely accuse have had nothing done to them.[/p]"I would welcome this course of action because at the moment there are too many people jumping on the bandwagon as they are aware they can get compensation for false accusations.[/p]"It's not fair on the girls who have actually been raped. The police often waste their time looking into cases like this when there are girls out there who have actually been raped."[/p]She added: "I'm happy that the deterrent that has been there all the time is beginning to be used because very few, up until now, have been taken to court."[/p]Earlier this month a man jailed for five years for a sex attack had his conviction quashed after fresh evidence pointed to his "victim" being a liar.[/p]Warren Blackwell, 36, of Byfield Road, Woodford Halse, Northamptonshire, was found guilty at Northampton Crown Court in October 1999 of indecently assaulting the woman.[/p]The woman claimed that she was attacked in the early hours of New Year's Day 1999 after leaving a party at a social club.[/p]Mr Blackwell was jailed for three years and, in March 2002, the Court of Appeal refused his application for permission to appeal and increased his sentence to five years following an application by the Attorney General.[/p]In June 2004, the Criminal Cases Review Commission, which investigates possible miscarriages of justice, asked Northamptonshire Police to assist in reviewing the case and the conviction was subsequently referred back.[/p]In the Court of Appeal, Lady Justice Hallett, Mr Justice Silber and Mr Justice Tugendhat declared Mr Blackwell's conviction "unsafe" in the light of the Commission's report, which referred to new evidence relating to the credibility of the complainant.[/p]
come on now can't they get a better non revealing picture of her. She can't get a fair trial now. Because the paper has labeled her a 'whore' by the pic.
OK, if you lapdance for a private function................. you're asking for it.
[img id=_x0000_i1050 title="" height=85 src="vny!://attach.mud.mail.yahoo.com/us.f370.mail.yahoo.com/ym/us/ShowLetter?box=Inbox&MsgId=6297_11829451_2903_1390_386312_0_1559_561691_2339010972&bodyPart=1.25&YY=13957&order=&sort=" width=110 border=0]
Sportsdude wrote:
She can't get a fair trial now. Because the paper has labeled her a 'whore' by the pic.
Awwwwwwww, that's too bad.
Where are your tears for the poor f*ckers who she accused, the guys who were facing decades in prison for something they didn't do?
I guess if she hadn't committed a crime she wouldn't have to worry about it, would she?
I think your sanctimonious outrage and sympathy are a little misplaced. We'll see how sympathetic you are when she accuses you.
I'm thinking the recording will speak volumes as to whether her 'image' is being tainted by this picture.
Sportsdude wrote:
come on now can't they get a better non revealing picture of her. She can't get a fair trial now. Because the paper has labeled her a 'whore' by the pic.
yes, she looks so wholesome it's inconceivable to think she ever turned a trick.
TehBorken wrote:
<font size="4">G</font><font size="4"><font size="4">ood, this is exactly what should happen if you try to destroy the lives of other people by making false allegations.</font>
</font><hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px;">
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe ; but my oh my, TehBorken, aren't we being so damn selfrighteous again today ?
OMFGSD wrote:
Sportsdude wrote:
She can't get a fair trial now. Because the paper has labeled her a 'whore' by the pic.
Awwwwwwww, that's too bad.
Where are your tears for the poor f*ckers who she accused, the guys who were facing decades in prison for something they didn't do?
I guess if she hadn't committed a crime she wouldn't have to worry about it, would she?
I think your sanctimonious outrage and sympathy are a little misplaced. We'll see how sympathetic you are when she accuses you.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I see you are walking with your eyes wide open, OMFGSD. :)
Mutilated Mind wrote:
Maybe ; but my oh my, TehBorken, aren't we being so damn selfrighteous again today ?
I can do that; it's in my contract. (//forums/richedit/smileys/Happy/14.gif)
I'm not supporting what she did I think she deserves to be punished. But to have a paper post a picture of her in her underwear I think is a little strong and misguided. Its like saying "here's the whore lets burn her at the stake" mentality.
TehBorken wrote:
Mutilated Mind wrote:
Maybe ; but my oh my, TehBorken, aren't we being so damn selfrighteous again today ?
I can do that; it's in my contract. <img src="/forums/richedit/smileys/Happy/14.gif" border="0"> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It IS ???
But, TehBorken, I would've thought you were the only one around here who signed a contract ?
Stupid whore.