Google ordered to hand over data

Started by Sportsdude, Mar 19 06 08:28

Previous topic - Next topic

Sportsdude

[DIV class=logo][img height=34 alt="BBC NEWS" src="vny!://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/nol/shared/img/printer_friendly/news_logo.gif" width=163] [/DIV][DIV class=headline]Google ordered to hand over data [/DIV]A federal judge has ordered internet search engine Google to turn over some search data, including 50,000 web addresses, to the US government. However, Judge James Ware denied a request that Google hand over a list of people's search requests. The Justice Department had wanted access to search records to help prevent access to online pornography. The judge said privacy considerations led him to deny part of the department's request. [DIV class=bo]"This concern, combined with the prevalence of internet searches for sexually explicit material, gives this court pause as to whether the search queries themselves may constitute potentially sensitive information," he said in his ruling. Google lawyer Nicole Wong said it was reassuring that the judge's decision had "sent a clear message about privacy". "What his ruling means is that neither the government nor anyone else has carte blanche when demanding data from internet companies," she said. Public perceptions The ruling said the request for 50,000 web addresses, or URLs, was relevant for use in a statistical study the government is undertaking to defend the constitutionality of its child anti-pornography law. Earlier, the government had reduced its request to just 50,000 web addresses and roughly 5,000 search terms from the millions or potentially billions of addresses it had initially sought. "The expectation of privacy by some Google users may not be reasonable," Judge Ware wrote, "but may nonetheless have an appreciable impact on the way in which Google is perceived, and consequently the frequency with which users use Google." The case has focused attention on the issue of personal information held by internet companies. The US Government is seeking to defend the 1998 Child Online Protection Act, which has been blocked by the Supreme Court because of legal challenges over how it is enforced. It wants the data from the search engines to prove how easy it is to stumble over porn on the net. Three of Google's competitors in internet search technology - AOL, Yahoo and MSN - have complied with subpoenas in the case.

[/DIV][DIV class=footer]Story from BBC NEWS:
vny!://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/technology/4821858.stm

Published: 2006/03/19 09:44:59 GMT

© BBC MMVI
[/DIV]
"We can't stop here. This is bat country."

soapbox

[A href="vny!://edition.cnn.com/2006/TECH/internet/03/19/google.hearing.ap/index.html"]vny!://edition.cnn.com/2006/TECH/internet/03/19/google.hearing.ap/index.html[/A]

Legion

It's only a matter of time before we start hearing about government search spiders and then search algorithms are locked up (just like crypto ;) because it's a matter of national security.
curses!

kitten

The Thought Police are coming!  Too late............they're at the door demanding to be let in.  I'm sure they're looking for a lot more than pornography.  That's only an excuse to monitor everyone a la Big Brother.  If it were only child porn, I'd agree wholeheartedly, but this goes way beyond that.  I thought one had to have probable cause plus a search warrant to intrude on personal privacy.  I guess that's an old-fashioned notion now.
Thousands of years ago cats were worshipped.  They have not forgotten.

Legion

People looking for dirt often find it. lol. Seek and ye shall find.

I disagree with the Nietzschean re-evaluation that is inherent in such reasoning.

They've made everyone guilty until proven innocent.
 
curses!

soapbox

relax everybody...

as clearly stated before the courts,the feds wanted to see a list of searches (random) in order to have a statistical idea of how much porn (child porn) was being looked for.

no attempt is being made to look for certain individuals or site operators as that is law enforcement from another level.

google said no to the original request of a 1 week sample of searches.so the feds revised own to 5,000 randomw samples to be taken april 5th.courts will review the case with google concerning the most recent revision down.

btw - yahoo and aol said yes to the week search and stated they would supply "whatever" was requested.

google the bad guy (all the flak about china?) me thinks not. google the good guy.

Adam_Fulford

Americans are rising against the Fascists who've hijacked US democracy.

Legion

If I hadda hold of Googles treasure trove of information I could make all kinds of suppositions about a person through their searches.

Gosh, if I had this info... I could find out who anyone is, and what they are into, are they good? Are they bad? Hmm, if only there was an IP address that I could follow. lol.

Then...I put two and two together, and if I was in the right kinda mood, you'd all be guilty of something ;)  
curses!

Marik

Americans are rising up... facists... you're starting to sound like Roger, adam.