A coalition between the Liberals and NDPers

Started by Sportsdude, Jul 31 06 06:03

Previous topic - Next topic

Sportsdude

Its pretty long but good article. Makes me think that it would be a good idea for the NDP and Liberals to enter into a coalition for the time being. I think a coalition government is the best way to end polarization. America needs one but no one wants to do it. Kerry asked McCain to be his running partner but alas he was only it for himself and decided not do a bi partisan ticket.  After all a country should be uniting and not dividing.

   I'm seeing a growing divide in Canada granted its more rural vs. urban then red state blue state but I do see as an outsider that Canada has become to regionalized. Instead of being "canadians" I see "I'm an Albertan, Quebecios, BCer and so on".  Regionalism is fine until you start believing that your province comes before the state.  Canada is a federation. Think of it as differnt groups of people coming together and uniting under one goal.  Federation in essence is almost tribal but the tribes must get along for it to work. Last thing the country needs is alienation from each other.  
"We can't stop here. This is bat country."

Sportsdude

Oh and the article, I completely forgot about it:

  [A href="vny!://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&cid=1154209809896&call_pageid=968332188774&col=968350116467"]vny!://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&cid=1154209809896&call_pageid=968332188774&col=968350116467[/A]
"We can't stop here. This is bat country."

soapbox

canadians tend to identify themselves by their respective provinces simply because the country is so large with a small population.

  for example,affairs in ontario have very little to do with BC'ers....whether it is because regional or national media does not broadcast eastern issues first or whether it is a matter of eastern issues have no interest here i don't know.

  canada is regionalized more so i suspect than the usa (still i wonder how much a rural kansas dweller has in common with a urban bostonian?) also because of the diversity in economic function.

  BC fishing has little impact on manitoba farming.ontario manufacturing little relevance to yukon hunting.quebec language issues little impact on albertan commodity extraction.

  consequently politics are a natural extension to those distinct provincial characteristics.

  canada is a confederation indeed,but we have a soft federalism,whereas,the USA or Germany has a tradition of a stronger federalism and concentration of concern seems to be in the capital.

  we have not really changed all that much politically in the last 30 years,with the exception of a few events (reform party collapse or the FLQ emergence coupled with quebec separtist ambitions that come and go depending on the weather or who can whip up nationalist emotions the best)