Canadian Gov't Pays Copyright Lobby to Lobby

Started by TehBorken, Jun 26 06 07:37

Previous topic - Next topic

TehBorken

 [h3]Surprise surprise, the Canadian government is just as crooked as the American government.
[/h3][hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px;"][h3]Canadian Government Pays Copyright Lobby to Lobby        
[/h3][blockquote] While the Canadian goverment is focused on accountability, my weekly Law Bytes column suggests that another form of lobbying exists that requires closer scrutiny - lobbying that is financed by the government itself. According to government documents obtained under the Access to Information Act , last fall the Ministry of Canadian Heritage entered into a multi-year agreement with the Creators' Rights Alliance, a national coalition of artists groups and copyright collectives with members both small (the League of Canadian Poets) and large (SOCAN and Access Copyright). The CRA has eight objectives, which notably include "to ensure that government policy and legislation recognize that copyright is fundamentally about the rights of creators" and "to ensure that international treaties and obligations to which Canada is signatory provide the strongest possible protection for the rights of creators." The Canadian Heritage - CRA agreement, which could run until 2008 at a total cost of nearly $400,000, appears to be designed primarily to enable the CRA to lobby the government on copyright reform. The structure of the contract itself appears to have raised some eyebrows within Canadian Heritage. As the funding was being considered, an internal memo noted that the Copyright Policy Branch "would be funding an organization through this contract to provide comments on government policy. There is a concern that the Copyright Policy Branch would be setting an unwanted precedent in such matters." To address that issue, a different branch within the same Cultural Affairs department administers the contract. [/p]Internal correspondence also reveals that the contract was designed to further the department's own policy objectives. A senior official outlined the rationale behind the proposed contract, stating in an email that once the CRA funding was complete, "we should have streamlined, stable funding to an organization whose structure, purpose and activities suit our own policy needs." [/p]Those activities were clearly identified in an email to Canadian Heritage from CRA's co-chair who commented that "the job of taking on the educational sector on copyright reform is clearly a huge and major undertaking," adding that education was a "well heeled, publicly funded lobby. . . devoted to abolishing creators' rights on the Internet." [/p][/blockquote]  [a  href="http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&cid=1151273413030&call_pageid=971794782442&col=971886476975"]Link[/a]

 
The real trouble with reality is that there's no background music.

Adam_Fulford

Not sure what that lobby is about, but it does some like odd conflict of interest. I'll say that I find Canadian copyright to be toothless and ineffectual.  For example, if I copyright a script in Canada, they don't take the whole script, they just want the title and a brief description of it.  Ideas and titles are meaningless when it comes to copyright, while the actual execution of a script is everything.  For this reason, I copyright my work in the States.