Fusion reactor work gets go-ahead

Started by Sportsdude, May 24 06 01:32

Previous topic - Next topic

Sportsdude

 [DIV class=headline]Fusion reactor work gets go-ahead [/DIV]Seven international parties involved in an experimental nuclear fusion reactor project have initialled a 10bn-euro (£6.8bn) agreement on the plan. The International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (Iter) will be the most expensive joint scientific project after the International Space Station.  Wednesday's agreement in Brussels gives the go-ahead for practical work on the project to start.  Fusion taps energy from reactions like those that power the Sun.  [DIV class=bo] The seven-party consortium, which includes the European Union, the US, Japan, China, Russia and others, agreed last year to build Iter in Cadarache, in the southern French region of Provence.  Cleaner energy The parties say fusion will lead to a cheaper, safer, cleaner and endless energy resource in the years ahead.  "We represent more than half of the world's population, and recognise that by working together today we stand a much better chance of tackling the challenges of tomorrow, so energy is an issue of concern for all of us," said EU science and research commissioner, Janez Potocnik, after the ceremony.  



[DIV class=ibox]
[TBODY]
[TD width=5][/TD] [TD class=fact] [DIV class=sih]ITER - NUCLEAR FUSION PROJECT [/DIV][!--So--][!--Eo--][!--Smva--] [DIV class=bull]Project estimated to cost 10bn euros and will run for 35 years

[DIV class=bull]It will produce the first sustained fusion reactions

[DIV class=bull]Final stage before full prototype of commercial reactor is built [/DIV][!--Emva--][/TD][/TR][/TBODY][/TABLE]

[DIV class=bo]He said that the participants would aim to ratify their agreement before the end of the year so construction on the facility could start in 2007. Officials said the experimental reactor would take about eight years to build. The EU is to foot about 50% of the cost to build the experimental reactor, with the six other parties contributing 10% each.  If all goes well with the experimental reactor, officials hope to set up a demonstration power plant at Cadarache by 2040.  In a fusion reaction, energy is produced when light atoms - the hydrogen isotopes deuterium and tritium - are fused together to form heavier atoms.  To use controlled fusion reactions on Earth as an energy source, it is necessary to heat a gas to temperatures exceeding 100 million Celsius - many times hotter than the centre of the Sun.  The technical requirements to do this, which scientists have spent decades developing, are immense; but the rewards, if Iter can be made to work successfully, are extremely attractive.  Investment costs One kilogram of fusion fuel would produce the same amount of energy as 10,000,000kg of fossil fuel.  Fusion does produce radioactive waste but not the volumes of long-term high-level radiotoxic materials that have so burdened nuclear fission.  Officials project that 10-20% of the world's energy could come from fusion by the end of the century. However, environmental groups have criticised the project, saying there was no guarantee that the billions of euros would result in a commercially viable energy source.  



[DIV class=bo]"Investment in energy efficiency and renewables is the only reliable way to guarantee energy security," said Silvia Hermann, from Friends of the Earth Europe. "Giving billions of euros to a single nuclear project that is so far from reality is ill judged and irresponsible."  The European Commission said the investment costs were justified, explaining that the technology used in fusion reactor plants would be "inherently safe, with no possibility of meltdown, or runaway reactions."  The Cadarache site is also expected to boost Europe's role in developing new technologies and is likely to create about 10,000 jobs.  The consortium had been divided over where to put the test reactor, and competition was intense. Russia, China and the European Union wanted it at Cadarache; while Japan, the US and South Korea wanted the facility built at Rokkasho in northern Japan.  Japan withdrew its bid after agreeing to a bigger role in research and operations.  The Cadarache site lies about 60km (37 miles) inland from Marseille, and has been a nuclear research centre ever since President Charles de Gaulle launched France's atomic energy programme in 1959.

 

 [img height=152 alt="Delegates toast after initialling an agreement to start work on the 10 billion-euro Iter project   Image: AFP" hspace=0 src="vny!://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/41682000/jpg/_41682016_deal_afp_203.jpg" width=203 border=0]  [DIV class=cap]The agreement gives the go-ahead for work to start

[DIV class=cap]

[DIV class=cap] [DIV class=o][img height=152 alt="" hspace=0 src="vny!://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/41681000/jpg/_41681970_nuclear_reactor_203.jpg" width=203 border=0]

[DIV class=mva] [DIV class=bull]Project estimated to cost 10bn euros and will run for 35 years

[DIV class=bull]It will produce the first sustained fusion reactions

[DIV class=bull]Final stage before full prototype of commercial reactor is built

[DIV class=bull]

[DIV class=bull][img height=152 alt="" hspace=0 src="vny!://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/41681000/gif/_41681988_france_cadarache_map203.gif" width=203 border=0][/DIV][/DIV][/DIV][/DIV][/DIV]
"We can't stop here. This is bat country."

Sportsdude

The European Commission said the investment costs were justified, explaining that the technology used in fusion reactor plants would be "inherently safe, with no possibility of meltdown, or runaway reactions."

  Yeah they always say that.
"We can't stop here. This is bat country."

Dissident

Hey, Sportsdude, know your physics.  I remember writing a paper on fusion back in high school, and a college buddy of mine was the daughter of a "plasma physicist"--what they called fusion types in those days--so I learned a little bit about this field, which evidently hasn't changed a whole lot in the last 15 years ("cold fusion" hoaxes notwithstanding).

The biggest issue with fusion is that it's a big energy sink.  So far there has been no method of energy production that hasn't required huge amounts of energy to even get a reaction going.  "Heavy hydrogen" (the fuel for fusion) is nothing like plutonium and other fissionable products.  Though I don't expect to see efficient fusion anytime in the next 20 years, I would be surprised if experiments in the field produced more radiation than EMFs that are the focus of a lot attention these days.

Mind you, that doesn't mean that there might not be heavy metals involved in the construction of the facility mentioned that could be an environmental hazard.  Plus the sheer acreage involved in constructing the linear accelerators that are involved with these reactors is another concern.
 
fenec rawks!