Judge Bans Book On Corruption In Family Court

Started by TehBorken, Mar 27 06 02:25

Previous topic - Next topic

TehBorken

  If a 'Judge' admits that the Constitution is invalid in his courtroom logically it must be a court moving in Admiralty.
 [hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px;"]
 Judge Bans Book On Corruption In Family Court[o:p style="font-weight: bold;"][/o:p]  
 
 In the state of Massachusetts,  a Judge has banned a book on the
 corruption of family courts.  There is a chapter in the book devoted
 to the  same Judge Mainz who has just issued an injunction until the
 year 2021.
 
 Attached is a press release the book's author has written on this
 order.   Kevin is nothing more that a father wanting to see and be
 with his child.
 
 [hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px;"]
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
 
 IT'S OFFICIAL: JUDGE BANS FATHER'S BOOK ON CORRUPTION IN FAMILY COURT
 
On March 22, 2006, Essex Probate and Family Court Justice Mary
McCauley Manzi, made it clear that First Amendment rights do not apply
in her courtroom when she banned Kevin Thompson's tell-all book titled
"Exposing the Corruption in the Massachusetts Family Courts."
 
 What makes this particular ruling so outrageous is that Manzi is
prominently criticized in the book for her judicial misconduct in
Thompson's case. Therefore, a clear conflict of interest existed that
 should have excluded Manzi from having jurisdiction.
 
 
 This issue has caused a stir among civil rights and fathers' rights
 groups in the state who have tired of the illegal treatment that they
 receive in family court where constitutional law is routinely ignored.
  Dr. Ned Holstein, founder of the parental advocacy group Fathers and
 Families, argued, "Manzi should have recused herself from ruling on a
 book in which she's criticized.  I think the Family Court has lost all
 sight of the Constitution in this matter and in many others."
 
 
 Aware of the media interest in the story, Manzi refused to release her
 ruling by phone to Thompson, who received his notice by mail on
 Friday, March 24, 2006.  The order permanently restrains Thompson from
 disseminating any information related to his custody case and impounds
 the custody case itself until the year 2021.
 
 
 Manzi's rationale for this action is that "impoundment is necessary to
 protect the best interests including the privacy interests of the
 parties' minor child."  She wrote further, "no harm will be caused to
 the community interest by impounding this file."
 
 
 When reached for comment, Thompson asked, "what privacy interests of
 my son have been compromised and whose interests are being protected
 other than the personal interests of Judge Manzi, Judge Digangi, and
 the three judges in appeals court who don't want their crimes to be
 exposed?"
 
 
 Thompson commented further,  "No community interest is harmed other
 than the community's right to scrutinize the judiciary, hold it
 accountable, and prevent from happening the concealed crimes committed
 against fathers and children every day in family court for profit."
 
 When asked whether he would adhere to the order, Thompson commented,
 "I made it clear at the hearing that Judge Manzi did not have the
 jurisdiction to ban my book.  Any order issued from such a hearing
 would be illegal and therefore, null and void.  Since I respect the
 law, I have no intentions of adhering to an illegal order issued by a
 judge with her own agenda."
 
 Thompson is scheduled for court on April 19, 2006, to respond to the
 Mother's request for attorney fees incurred to ban Thompson's book.
 Manzi has requested financial statements from both parents before she
 rules on this motion.  Thompson commented, "what could possibly be the
 relevance of financial statements in the determination of whether or
 not to extort the mother's attorney fees from me?  This is how the
 family courts bully fathers into silence - jail them for ignoring
 illegal orders or financially ruin them by making them pay for
 attorneys who they did not hire.  Everything that I am doing right now
 is for my son.  I will not be shut up."
 
 
The real trouble with reality is that there's no background music.