Settings
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
Nov 22 08 01:20

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
141841 Posts in 6286 Topics by 175 Members
Latest Member: ProjectoR kiDD
        * Home | Help | Search | Login | Register
Discover Seattle!  |  General Category  |  Discover Seattle!  |  Topic: Law makers don't get that intarweb thingy - again. « previous next »
Pages:
[1]  
Reply | Send this topic | Print
Author Topic: Law makers don't get that intarweb thingy - again.  (Read 31 times)
TehBorken
-----------------
SuperHero Member
*****

Karma: +352/-12
Posts: 4746



View Profile WWW
Law makers don't get that intarweb thingy - again.
« on: Jul 26 06 07:03 »
Reply with quote

Yet again American law makers show the world that they just don't understand the intarweb. I can't believe they're wasting their time on idiotic, unenforceable crap like this. I mean, 20 years in prison for a misleading META tag?

I'm going to have start committing crimes with lighter punishments, like murder and rape.


The U.S. House of Representatives on Tuesday approved a bill that would make it a federal felony for Webmasters to use innocent words like "Barbie" or "Furby" but actually feature sexual content on their sites. Anyone who includes misleading "words" or "images" intended to confuse a minor into viewing a possibly harmful Web site could be imprisoned for up to 20 years and fined, the bill says.
 
SEC. 703. DECEPTION BY emb edDED WORDS OR IMAGES.

   (a) In General- Chapter 110 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 2252B the following:

`Sec. 2252C. Misleading words or digital images on the Internet

`(a) In General- Whoever knowingly emb eds words or digital images into the source code of a website with the intent to deceive a person into viewing material constituting obscenity shall be fined under this title and imprisoned for not more than 10 years.

`(b) Minors- Whoever knowingly emb eds words or digital images into the source code of a website with the intent to deceive a minor into viewing material harmful to minors on the Internet shall be fined under this title and imprisoned for not more than 20 years.

`(c) Construction- For the purposes of this section, a word or digital image that clearly indicates the sexual content of the site, such as `sex' or `porn', is not misleading.

   `(d) Definitions- As used in this section--

      `(1) the terms `material that is harmful to minors' and `sex' have the meaning given such terms in section 2252B; and

`(2) the term `source code' means the combination of text and other characters comprising the content, both viewable and nonviewable, of a web page, including any website publishing language, programming language, protocol or functional content, as well as any successor languages or protocols.'.

(b) Table of Sections- The table of sections for chapter 110 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2252B the following:

      `2252C. Misleading words or digital images on the Internet.'.

   
Logged

The real trouble with reality is that there's no background music.
Pages:
[1]  
Reply | Send this topic | Print 
Discover Seattle!  |  General Category  |  Discover Seattle!  |  Topic: Law makers don't get that intarweb thingy - again. « previous next »
Jump to:  

+ Quick Reply
 
Share this story!    del.icio.us  digg  Reddit  Furl  Fark  TailRank  Ma.gnolia  NewsVine  Simpy  Spurl 
Crazy Pictures! :: Death Psychic :: HeMale Or SheMale? :: Who's Pregnant? :: Divorce Help :: Supervised Visitation
US Cycle Rally :: Sudoku! :: Great Games :: Easy Recipes :: Press Release :: WordScrabbler :: Web Gags! :: Win Child Custody


Discover Seattle! | Powered by SMF 1.0.7. - © 2001-2005, Lewis Media. All Rights Reserved.