Circumcision More Effective HIV Prevention Methods Than Condoms

Started by TehBorken, Apr 27 06 06:27

Previous topic - Next topic

TehBorken

 [h3]Circumcision, Fidelity More Effective HIV Prevention Methods Than Condoms, Abstinence, Researchers Say[/h3][a href="http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/sections/hiv-aids/"][/a] Article Date: 27 Apr 2006 - 1:00am (PDT)[img]http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/images/transpixel.gif" alt="" align="right" height="10" width="1"]

 Promoting male circumcision and fidelity to one partner seems to be more effective at curbing the spread of HIV than promoting abstinence and condom use, [a href="http://www.usaid.gov/" target="_blank"]USAID[/a] researcher and technical adviser Daniel Halperin said last week, the [a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-0604230375apr23,1,6377640.story" target="_blank"][cite]Chicago Tribune[/cite][/a] reports. As Halperin and other researchers analyze 20 years of studies on HIV/AIDS throughout Africa, they have tried to "put aside intuitions, emotions, ideologies and look at the evidence in as coldhearted a way as we can," Halperin said.

During a speech at a meeting of the [a href="http://www.sahivclinicianssociety.org/" target="_blank"]Southern African HIV Clinicians Society[/a] in Johannesburg, South Africa, Halperin said he and his colleagues discovered that regular sex partners rarely use condoms, and abstinence merely delays HIV infection among young people by one or two years. For example, condom use in Ghana and Senegal seems to have helped in the reduction of the spread of the HIV, which in those countries is particularly prevalent among commercial sex workers and their partners. However, condom use in South Africa and Botswana has had little effect in reducing those countries' HIV epidemics -- which have reached the general population -- because regular sex partners rarely use condoms consistently.

In comparison, faithfulness to one partner has worked at reducing HIV prevalence in Uganda and Kenya, according to Halperin. Because a person is more likely to transmit HIV during the first three weeks of contracting the virus, an HIV-positive person who has just one partner during that time is likely to pass the disease to that one person. But if an HIV-positive person in the highly infectious stage has many sexual partners at a time, "the virus spreads like wildfire" as those people in turn have sex with other people, Halperin said.

In addition, circumcision has been shown to reduce male-to-female HIV transmission by 60% to 75% (Goering, [cite]Chicago Tribune[/cite], 4/23). A study published in the November 2005 issue of [a href="http://medicine.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-document&doi=10.1371/journal.pmed.0020298" target="_blank"][cite]PLoS Medicine[/cite][/a] of men living in South Africa finds that male circumcision might reduce the risk of men contracting HIV through sexual intercourse with women by about 60%. Male circumcision might also reduce the risk of HIV transmission from HIV-positive men to their female partners, according to a study of couples in Rakai, Uganda ([a href="http://www.kaisernetwork.org/daily_reports/rep_index.cfm?hint=1&DR_ID=35306" target="_blank"][cite]Kaiser Daily HIV/AIDS Report[/cite][/a], 2/9).  

Poverty Reduction, Status Awareness  

 In addition, poverty does not appear necessarily to make a person more susceptible to HIV. "[C]ontrary to popular wisdom, as income levels go up in both men and women, we see higher rates of HIV," Halperin said, adding that people who make more money tend to have more sexual partners. Other HIV prevention methods such as encouraging people to know their status and treating secondary sexually transmitted infections also have not proven effective, Halperin said ([cite]Chicago Tribune[/cite], 4/23).  

"Reprinted with permission from [a href="http://www.kaisernetwork.org/" target="_blank"]http://www.kaisernetwork.org[/a]. You can view the entire Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery at [a href="http://www.kaisernetwork.org/dailyreports/healthpolicy" target="_blank"]http://www.kaisernetwork.org/dailyreports/healthpolicy[/a]. The Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report is published for kaisernetwork.org, a free service of The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation . © 2005 Advisory Board Company and Kaiser Family Foundation. All rights reserved. [br clear="all"][img]http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/imagesranspixel.gif" alt="" height="20" width="1"]  
The real trouble with reality is that there's no background music.

Gopher

Has anyone done a study of this among the Jewish population?
A fool's paradise is better than none.

academe

Yeah, there should have been the same sort of study among cultural groups such as Jews and Muslims that do mandatory mutilation of male infant penises...this seems to be a study that is not generalized to the rest of the world and I'd like to know how large the sample population was...

  I believe this is yet another scare tactic under the guise of HIV in persuading parents to mutilate their baby son's penis...Hasn't anyone done the same research on women?  After all they have vulva lips and clitoral hoods which harbour the same kind of "germs and ickyness" that a foreskin would...

  I've always been of the staunch opinion that if you aren't supposed to have a certain body part you wouldn't be born with it...there IS a reason a penis has a foreskin just like baby girls are born with vulvas and clitoral hoods but we don't go around whacking them off because they look "ewww" or it is "more santiary/healthy" to do so.

Sportsdude

Gopher wrote:
 Has anyone done a study of this among the Jewish population?[/DIV]
 
I've heard a bunch of cases from new york that involve extreme orthodox jewish rabbi's that get std's and hiv through this bizzare form of circumcision where the rabbi 'bites' off the new born's foreskin.
"We can't stop here. This is bat country."

Gopher

A fool's paradise is better than none.

Sportsdude

"We can't stop here. This is bat country."

Gopher

Sportsdude wrote:
 Yeah I know pretty strange.[/DIV]
 Please don't tell me he eats it too.  
A fool's paradise is better than none.

Sportsdude

I don't know I'm not jewish but the ultra ultra orthodox sect is pretty extreme so it wouldn't shock me if he did.
"We can't stop here. This is bat country."

Gopher

Sportsdude wrote:
 I don't know I'm not jewish but the ultra ultra orthodox sect is pretty extreme so it wouldn't shock me if he did.[FONT color=#00407f]What a superb paradox when the doings of thee ultra orthodox are seen by almost everyone else as being unorthodox.[/FONT]
A fool's paradise is better than none.

Sportsdude

 [H3]By mouth[/H3] Metzitzah b'peh ("suction by mouth") is a [A title=Halakha href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halakha"]Halakhic[/A] practice in [A title=Haredi href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haredi"]Haredi[/A] and [A title=Hasidic href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hasidic"]Hasidic[/A] circles in which the [A title=Mohel href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohel"]mohel[/A] has mouth-to-genital contact during ritual circumcision of baby boys. After the mila, the mohel then sucks the baby's penis once to draw blood, much in the same fashion as medical science once prescribed for snakebite. The mohel spits the blood into a receptacle provided. Afterwards the circumcised penis is bandaged, and the operation considered complete.

 Some have feared that the practice may spread diseases to the babies from the mohel's mouth (such as [A title=Herpes href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herpes"]herpes[/A]), but most mohelim are aware of this and ensure that their mouths are sanitized and washed out by rinsing with [A title=Ethanol href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethanol"]alcohol[/A] to disinfect the mouth. However, controversy arose in [A title="New York City" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_City"]New York City[/A] when health officials announced that in December of 2005 that they suspected that two infants who underwent the procedure had been infected with herpes and that one of them had subsequently suffered brain damage. As the of the date of this writing, Jan/2006, there has been no confirmation that the mohel was the source of these infections. [A class="external autonumber" title=http://select.nytimes.com/2006/01/09/nyregion/09matters.html?8hpib href="http://select.nytimes.com/2006/01/09/nyregion/09matters.html?8hpib"][3][/A] The foundation for the ritual of metzitzah b'peh is found in Mishnah Shabbat 19:2, which lists metzitzah b'peh as one of the four steps involved in the circumcision rite. The Chatam Sofer observed that the Mishnah states that the rationale for this part of the ritual was hygienic — i.e., to protect the health of the child. He also cited a passage in Nedarim 32a as a warrant for the position that metzitzah b'peh was not an obligatory part of the circumcision ceremony.

 As a result of these texts, the Chatam Sofer contended that Jewish tradition instituted metzitzeh b'eh solely to prevent danger to the infant and stated that metzitzah b'peh was not a required part of the circumcision ceremony. [A class="external autonumber" title=http://www.thejewishweek.com/top/editletcontent.php3?artid=4591 href="http://www.thejewishweek.com/top/editletcontent.php3?artid=4591"][4][/A]

"We can't stop here. This is bat country."

Sportsdude

Here it is being performed:

[A href="http://www.aztlan.net/metzitzah_b_peh.gif"]http://www.aztlan.net/metzitzah_b_peh.gif[/A]
"We can't stop here. This is bat country."

Trollio

 academe wrote:
I've always been of the staunch opinion that if you aren't supposed to have a certain body part you wouldn't be born with it...
 
 And the appendix?....  birth defects?....  extra heads or limbs coming out of torsos?....
 
 Also, don't ever go anywhere by plane again. If people were meant to fly, we'd have wings.
 
one must be intelligent to get intelligent answers.
— bebu

Trollio

 Sportsdude wrote:
[div style="font-style: italic;"]I don't know I'm not jewish [em]but[/em] the ultra ultra orthodox sect is pretty extreme so it wouldn't shock me if he did.[/div]
 
 Most
Jews know nothing of this practice, which is done by only a small minority of very odd and isolated Jews.
 
 Also, the website where that image comes from is no friend of Jews. That's putting it politely. When people start putting their opinions of Jews and Jewish affairs into websites about Mexican/American issues, it raises some really big questions about the agenda behind the agenda.
 
one must be intelligent to get intelligent answers.
— bebu